To Aim Ads, Web Is Keeping Closer Eye on You
A famous New Yorker cartoon from 1993 showed two dogs at a computer, with one saying to the other, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.”
A new analysis of online consumer data shows that large Web companies are learning more about people than ever from what they search for and do on the Internet, gathering clues about the tastes and preferences of a typical user several hundred times a month.
These companies use that information to predict what content and advertisements people most likely want to see. They can charge steep prices for carefully tailored ads because of their high response rates.
The analysis, conducted for The New York Times by the research firm comScore, provides what advertising executives say is the firstbroad estimate of the amount of consumer data that is transmitted to Internet companies.
Privacy advocates have previously sounded alarms about the practices of Internet companies and provided vague estimates about the volume of data they collect, but they did not give comprehensive figures.
The Web companies are, in effect, taking the trail of crumbs people leave behind as they move around the Internet, and then analyzing them to anticipate people’s next steps. So anybody who searches for information on such disparate topics as iron supplements, airlines, hotels and soft drinks may see ads for those products and services later on.
Consumers have not complained to any great extent about data collection online. But privacy experts say that is because the collection is invisible to them. Unlike Facebook’s Beacon program, which stirred controversy last year when it broadcast its members’ purchases to their online friends, most companies do not flash a notice on the screen when they collect data about visitors to their sites.
“When you start to get into the details, it’s scarier than you might suspect,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a privacy rights group. “We’re recording preferences, hopes, worries and fears.”
But executives from the largest Web companies say that privacy fears are misplaced, and that they have policies in place to protect consumers’ names and other personal information from advertisers. Moreover, they say, the data is a boon to consumers, because it makes the ads they see more relevant.
These companies often connect consumer data to unique codes identifying their computers, rather than their names.
“What is targeting in the long term?” said Michael Galgon, Microsoft’s chief advertising strategist. “You’re getting content about things and messaging about things that are spot-on to who you are.”
The rich troves of data at the fingertips of the biggest Internet companies are also creating a new kind of digital divide within the industry. Traditional media companies, which collect far less data about visitors to their sites, are increasingly at a disadvantage when they compete for ad dollars.
The major television networks and magazine and newspaper companies “aren’t even in the same league,” said Linda Abraham, an executive vice president at comScore. “They can’t really play in this sandbox.”
During the Internet’s short life, most people have used a yardstick from traditional media to measure success: audience size. Like magazines and newspapers, Web sites are most often ranked based on how many people visit them and how long they are there.
But on the Internet, advertisers are increasingly choosing where to place their ads based on how much sites know about Web surfers. ComScore’s analysis is a novel attempt to estimate how many times major Web companies can collect data about their users in a given month.
Web companies once could monitor the actions of consumers only on their own sites. But over the last couple of years, the Internet giants have spread their reach by acting as intermediaries that place ads on thousands of Web sites, and now can follow people’s activities on far more sites.
Large Web companies like Microsoft and Yahoo have also acquired a number of companies in the last year that have rich consumer data.
“So many of the deals are really about data,” said David Verklin, chief executive of Carat Americas, an ad agency in the Aegis Group that decides where to place ads for clients.
“Everyone feels that if we can get more data, we could put ads in front of people who are interested in them,” he said. “That’s the whole idea here: put dog food ads in front of people who have dogs.”
Web companies also can collect more data as people spend more time online. The number of searches that American Web users enter each month has nearly doubled since summer of 2006, to 14.6 billion searches in January, according to comScore.
ComScore analyzed 15 major media companies’ potential to collect online data in December. The analysis captured how many searches, display ads, videos and page views occurred on those sites and estimated the number of ads shown in their ad networks.
These actions represented “data transmission events” — times when consumer data was zapped back to the Web companies’ servers. Five large Web operations — Yahoo, Google, Microsoft, AOL and MySpace — record at least 336 billion transmission events in a month, not counting their ad networks.
The methodology was worked out with comScore and based on the advice of senior online advertising executives at two of the largest Internet companies.
“I think it’s a reasonable way to look at how many touch-points companies have with their consumers,” Jules Polonetsky, the chief privacy officer for AOL, said of the comScore findings on Friday.
But Mr. Polonetsky cautions that not all of the data at every company is used together. Much of it is stored separately.
The information transmitted might include the person’s ZIP code, a search for anything from vacation information to celebrity gossip, or a purchase of prescription drugs or other intimate items. Some types of data, like search queries, tends to be more valuable than others.
Yahoo came out with the most data collection points in a month on its own sites — about 110 billion collections, or 811 for the average user. In addition, Yahoo has about 1,700 other opportunities to collect data about the average person on partner sites like eBay, where Yahoo sells the ads.
MySpace, which is owned by the News Corporation, and AOL, a unit of Time Warner, were not far behind.
ComScore said it recorded the ad networks using different methods and that the exact ordering of these top companies might vary with a different methodology, but the overall picture would be similar.
Google also has scores of data collection events, but the company says it is unique in that it mostly uses only current information rather than past actions to select ads.
The depth of Yahoo’s database goes far in explaining why AOL is talking with Yahoo about a merger and Microsoft is willing to pay more than $41.2 billion to acquire the company.
Traditional media companies come in far behind.
Condé Nast magazine sites, for example, have only 34 data collection events for the average site visitor each month. The numbers for other traditional media companies, as generated by comScore, were 45 for The New York Times Company; 49 for another newspaper company, the McClatchy Corporation; and 64 for the Walt Disney Company.
Some companies are trying to close the gap. Walt Disney, for example, is studying how to combine data from its divisions like ESPN, Disney and ABC. The News Corporation is exploring ways to use information that MySpace members post on that site to select ads for those members when they visit other News Corporation sites.
IAC is using data from its LendingTree site to deliver ads on its other sites to people it knows are looking for mortgages.
Some advertising executives say media companies will have little choice but to outsource their ad sales to companies like Microsoft and Yahoo to benefit from their data. The Web companies may prove they can use their algorithms and consumer information to better select which ads for visitors better than media companies can.
“I think a lot of publishers are going to find they don’t have enough data,” said David W. Kenny, chief executive of Digitas, a digital advertising agency in the Publicis Groupe. “There’s only going to be a handful of big players who can manage the data.”
People who spend more time on the Internet, of course, will have more information transmitted about them. The comScore per-person figures are averages; occasional Web users have far less transmitted about them.
The comScore figures do not include the data that consumers offer voluntarily when registering for sites or e-mail services. When consumers do so, they often give sites permission to link some of their interests or searches to their user name.
The figures also do not account for information people enter on social network pages. MySpace, for example, collects billions of user actions each day in the form of blogs, comments and profile updates, said Peter Levinsohn, president of Fox Interactive Media, which owns MySpace.
Even with all the data Web companies have, they are finding ways to obtain more. The giant Internet portals have been buying ad-delivery companies like DoubleClick and Atlas, which have stockpiles of information. Atlas, for example, delivers 6 billion ads every day. The comScore figures do not capture such data.
Executives from Web companies said they had been working toinformconsumers on their data practices.
These companies noted their consumer-protection policies. AOL, for example, lets users opt out of some ad targeting, Google lets users edit the search histories that are linked to their user names, Yahoo is working on a policy to obscure people’s computer identification addresses that are connected to search results, and Microsoftsays it does not link any of its visitors’ behavior to their user names, even if those people are registered.
A study of California adults last year found that 85 percent thought sites should not be allowed to track their behavior around the Web to show them ads, according to the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the University of California at Berkeley, which conducted the study.
投其所好,网络正紧跟你的脚步
1993年《纽约人》上刊登了一副著名漫画,画着坐在电脑前的两只狗,其中一只对另外一只说:“在网络上,没人会知道你是只狗。
这种情况恐怕在今天已大大不同了。
一项新的网络顾客调查数据显示大型的网络公司通过对人们的搜索记录及在网上行为的分析比过去更加了解他的顾客,每月他们都会对典型用户的喜好进行数百次搜集。
这些公司通过这些信息来预测什么内容、什么广告人们最喜欢看。因为极高的反馈率,他们可以将那些精心设计的广告进行价格调整。
由纽约时报委托 comScore研究公司进行的分析显示:广告商所说的关于大量顾客数据的最大喜好估计结果计将会送达那些网络公司。
由于先前受隐私权维护者的警告,网络公司只提供他们收集到的数据的模糊信息,并且往往不会给出完整内容。
事实上,网站公司通过追踪人们在浏览网页时遗留的信息,加以分析,接着推断人们的下步行为。所以任何在网上分别搜索提供熨衣服务、航空公司、旅馆、软饮料的人可能接下来就会看相关的产品及服务。
消费者不会对任何在线数据的收集表示不满。但是隐私专家说那是因为消费者根本看不到这些收集的结果。和Facebook的Beacon项目不同,该项目因为报出他的会员从网友那里购买赃物而在去年引起轩然大波,而大多数公司在收集用户在他们网站的信息时是不会留意显示器的。
"当你开始追查细节,才发现事实远比你想象中可怕。”电子信息隐私中心(一个隐私权维护组织)的执行理事,Marc Rotenberg说,“我们在网络上留下了喜好、希望、担忧和恐惧。”
但是来自最大的网站公司的总裁们说对于隐私的担忧是多此一举的,他们有保护顾客隐私的原则,例如他们不会把顾客的姓名及其它私人信息出现在广告中。他们还表示,这些数据对消费者来说是一则大大的实惠,因为他们可以从广告中得到更多对他们有用的信息。
这些公司常常会对顾客的数据和他们使用的电脑标以一一对应的编码,而不是和他们的姓名挂钩。
微软公司广告战略部部长Michael Galgon说:“长期这样做的目标是什么呢?你会从这些信息中发现你是谁。”
大型网络公司的这些从指尖得到的大量丰富的资料还在产业中建立了一种新型数据分配。传统的传媒公司收集到的站点游客数据少的可怜,这使得他们在广告市场的竞争中越来越趋于劣势。
主要的电视网、杂志和报业公司“甚至都没加入使用网络数据的行列中来,”comScore公司的执行副主席Linda Abraham说,“他们并没有真正加入到这场游戏中来。”
在因特网问世的短十几年中,大多数人还习惯用衡量传统传媒的方法衡量其是否成功,那就是看它的观众量。和报纸杂志一样,网站最多依赖的也是网站的客流量及他们在这里逗留的时间。
但是在因特网上,广告商们将广告放在哪里越来越取决于有多少网站对网络冲浪者的了解。ComScore公司的分析极富想象力地预计主要的网站公司在限定的月里能收集多少次这种数据。
网站公司过去可以在他们自己的站点上监视到消费者的行为。但是在过去的数年中,因特网巨头们早已将他们的势力以媒介的方式将广告发在数以千计的网站上,现在他们跟踪人们行为的途径已不仅仅限于网站。
大型网络公司,如微软、雅虎在去年也兼并了很多有丰富顾客数据的网络公司。
“有很多交易其实是纯粹冲着这些数据来的。”Carat Americas,Aegis Group 一家决定在何处打广告的机构的总裁David Verklin如是说。
“每个人都认为如果我们能掌握更多的数据,我们就可以将广告放在那些真正对其感兴趣的人面前。”他说:“简而言之就是将狗食的广告放在养狗人的面前。”
人们在线花费时间越多网络公司就可以收集到越多的数据。按照comScore的调查结果,自从2006年夏天,美国每月入网搜索人数增加一倍,1月时搜索人数达到146亿。
12月ComScore对15家主要网络公司的潜在在线数据收集进行分析。分析得出那些网站上搜索次数、广告、视频和网页浏览的次数,并且评估他们广告网上的广告数量。
当顾客信息反馈回网站公司服务器时,这些行动代表了“数据传输”时代的来临。5家大型网络公司——雅虎、谷歌、微软、美国在线服务公司和MySpace,在一个月共记录3360亿次信息传输,其中不包括他们自己的广告网站。
-
Facebook 详解
译者:本文译自英文维基百科条目“Facebook”。只翻译了个人觉得对中国互联网从业者有价值的部分。比如有关Facebook相关的法律纠纷,就略去了。中文维基百科只完成了原文2%的翻译。如中文维基百...
-
23种方法下载YouTube视频
尽管谷歌口袋里装有大把的钞票,最近针对YouTube的诉讼案件还是让人不得不考虑是否是时候把“管子”上喜爱的视频抢救出来存放在律师们看不到的地方——你的硬盘。 幸运的是,我们有大量工具可以将视频从Y...
-
Top 100 web2.0网站 最热门的100个网站
视频 *YouTube :YouTube(你的视频)是一个可以让用户免费上传、观赏、分享视频短片的热门视频共享网站 *Meta Cafe: Metacafe (麦塔咖啡厅)-得到最好的网上视频-搞笑...
-
聪明地使用Google的7个技巧
我在下面编辑了一份包含7个使用Google的技巧的清单,我相信每个人都会想要知道这些.我认为这些技巧合在一起已经代表了使用Google搜索的所有技巧和方法的最高成就.虽然除此之外还有很多小技巧,但这7...
-
“连接被重置”(上):现象和实情
“连接被重置”是一篇由大西洋月刊的James Fallows 撰写的关于中国网络审查的文章,我根据内容将文章分为三个部分在译言发表。 中国的防火长城粗鲁、草率,而且非常容易被触发。当然,这也是它如此...
-
Google办公室(总部)照片——世界各国的Google总部
Google办公室(总部)——位于世界各国的照片...这是做梦都想去工作的地方呀:)
-
信任--社会化网络的商业模式
译者:很有启发的一篇有关社会化网络的广告模式。“在大众媒体上做广告时,需要大名气,因为只有在观众已经知道这个名人是谁时,这些广告才有效。但是在社会化网络中,在他们的小型社区中出名的“小名人”能证明同样...
-
我鄙视Facebook(上)
卫报的更正声明:9/11之后美国情报机构对于对于高科技创新的热衷以及他们于1999年设立的一只叫做In-Q-Tel的风险投资基金在下文中被错误的联系在了一起。因为9/11发生在2001年,它不可能导...
标签:

投其所好,网络正紧跟你的脚步
翻译: